Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: Problem with transactions


  • From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
  • To: Matthijs Melissen <melissen(at)phil(dot)uu(dot)nl>
  • Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Problem with transactions
  • Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:35:55 +0100
  • Message-id: <4608BB4B(dot)1010708(at)archonet(dot)com>

Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I want two users to execute the following queries:

1) delete from forum where id = 'A';
1) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testa');

2) delete from forum where id = 'A';
2) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testb');

id is a unique key. The numbers designate the user (1 and 2). The problem is that I don't know in which order the queries are executed (I only know each user executes its DELETE query before the INSERT query). I can't use UPDATE because I don't know in advance that there exist a row with id A.

So how are you picking "A"? If you don't know whether that key is already in the database, why has user2 deleted user1's row?

If you want to know whether there is a row with that key in the database why not use a SELECT?

How do I prevent the queries from being executed in the wrong order and thus causing an 'duplicate key violates unique constraint' error?

You don't say what the "wrong" order is, and why.
You're trying to insert a duplicate key - you should get an error.

I think you're going to have to explain what it is you're trying to achieve. You're not trying to re-invent the SERIAL type are you?

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group