Re: perfromance world records

["Tomi N/A" <hefest(at)gmail(dot)com>]

2007/2/25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> If the objective is to claim a world record, we'd look pretty silly
> trying to do so with a nonstandard, non-certified test.  The point
> of certification in this context is that you have someone else
> attesting to the validity of your results.  Without that, your claim
> isn't going to be believed.

Makes sense. I got carried away a bit.
I guess I'll have to stick to the available case studies...maybe even
contribute one or two of those myself.

Cheers,
t.n.a.