Re: postgresql vs mysql
- From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Brandon Aiken" <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:42:02 +1300
- Message-id: <b35603930702221942q75d46f9fwba3ea6f379c5a0b(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
On 2/23/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
>> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
>> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
>> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> hits, too, I believe.
And outages if you watch :)
Well, there is that ... I didn't throw that in because I think MySQL is
great, on the contrary - we're having some issues with it here at
work (don't ask), but it is being used for large installations, too.
And then of
course there is this
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=2141344#post2141344
post where this guy (no idea whether he is (or was) what he claimed
to be) rambling on about how MySQL is better than PostgreSQL.
Joshua D. Drake
Cheers,
Andrej
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index