Re: postgresql vs mysql
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:53:33 -0800
- Message-id: <45DE3B0D(dot)5070300(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
>> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
>> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
>> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> hits, too, I believe.
And outages if you watch :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrej
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index