Re: "explain analyse" much slower than actual query
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_postgresql_general(at)chezphil(dot)org>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: "explain analyse" much slower than actual query
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:28:15 -0500
- Message-id: <22445(dot)1170019695(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
"Phil Endecott" <spam_from_postgresql_general(at)chezphil(dot)org> writes:
> If I understand it correctly, it is still doing a sequential scan on
> part_tsearch that does not terminate early due to the limit clause. So
> I'm still seeing run times that are rather worse than I think should be
> possible. Can it not step through the indexes in the way that it does
> for a Merge Join until it has got enough results to satisfy the limit,
> and then terminate?
Nope, there is not that much intelligence about NOT IN.
You could possibly manually rewrite the thing as a LEFT JOIN
with a WHERE inner-join-key IS NULL clause. This would probably
lose if most of the outer relation's rows join to many inner rows,
though.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index