Re: Generic timestamp function for updates where field

[novnov <novnovice(at)gmail(dot)com>]

Yes thanks that does make it clear.


Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 08:48:07AM -0800, novnov wrote:
>> Why would not be possible in plpgsql? It has loop etc, the only part I'm
>> not
>> sure it can do it use the variable as field name.
> 
> The "dynamic" in dynamic language usually refers to dynamic typing.
> pl/pgsql is a strictly typed language which means one can look at the
> code and determine what type each variable will be.
> 
> Languages like perl and python are dynamic because what type a variable
> is does not matter until runtime and the type can change every time you
> run it.
> 
> The problem with using a variable as a field name is that you can no
> longer tell what type the result will be. It could be any type
> supported by postgres. pl/pgsql can't handle that, perl and python
> can...
> 
> Hope this helps,
> -- 
> Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
>> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
>> litigate.
> 
>  
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Generic-timestamp-function-for-updates-where-field-names-vary-tf2899327.html#a8108978
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.