Re: Development of cross-platform GUI for Open Source DBs
- From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "John McCawley" <nospam(at)hardgeus(dot)com>
- Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Ritesh Nadhani" <rn(dot)mailing(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Development of cross-platform GUI for Open Source DBs
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:22:30 -0500
- Message-id: <b42b73150611301322j4a4738eft773cb1f192bca44d(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
On 11/30/06, John McCawley <nospam(at)hardgeus(dot)com> wrote:
I can't speak for wxPython etc., but regarding using QT from C++, your
speed of development depends on your C++ skills. I wrote a
full-featured Point of Sale system in Visual Basic that has been in
active use for about 4 years. The original development effort (screens,
grids, etc.) took about 3 weeks. I got tired of supporting an app that
I had to lug out my Windows/VB laptop for, so I decided to port it to
C++ so I could develop on my Linux box. I ported the entire thing over
to C++/QT in about a week.
QT is *extremely* good. My speed with developing GUI applications in
C++ is now on par with my abilities in VB...And I can't think of a tool
on earth faster than VB for cranking out quick-n-dirty apps :P
having used both, I can tell you that delphi is much better than vb
for developing database applications. you also can use the quixotic
hybrid in c++ builder which is a curious mixture of rad technology and
c++ power. however with each release since delphi 5 or so, borland
seems to be unable to do much more than add bugs to the product, and
so the market has moved on. also the kylix project was a complete
failure.
btw, I agree that qt is where it's at. great stuff.
merlin
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index