Re: performace review
- From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: performace review
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:22:11 -0500
- Message-id: <1161616931(dot)19772(dot)6(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain>
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:12 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Tomi NA wrote:
> >>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
> >>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
> >>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
> >>> It is 100% FUD.
> >>>
> >> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
> >> Does anyone know?
> >
> > That implies malice. The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> > believe what they wrote.
>
> I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
> complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.
Actually, after reading the reply from Brandon Aiken, I believe it was
driven by a complete lack of understanding of relational theory.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index