Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- From: Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>
- To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:05:57 +0200
> http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml > > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM. > Seems a little fishy to me. There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't manage to finish it (c't says connection pooling didn't work). See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php MySQL's winning submission was by a team from MySQL AB. Enough said... Bye, Chris. PS: this is, by the way a few months old, I'm wondering why MySQL does the press release only now... -- Chris Mair http://www.1006.org
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- From: Ned Lilly
- Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- From: Bill Moran
- Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- References:
- Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- From: Tony Caduto
- Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- Prev by Date: Re: Atomicity?
- Next by Date: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- Previous by thread: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- Next by thread: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
- Indexes: