Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:56:52 -0700
When we were trying to do DW stuff on Linux + Opteron + FibreChannel + EMC DiskArray, we too frequently found filesystems keeling over. It was neither cheap nor reliable.
When is When? Not trying to start a flame war but I am curious as to your specifications to make this stuff work. Was it kernel 2.4 or 2.6?
It 2.6, which? What filesystem are we talking about?
Are we talking the last 12 months? Or earlier then that?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- From: Chris Browne
- Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- References:
- SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- From: Riccardo Inverni
- Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- From: Chris Browne
- SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- Prev by Date: Re: PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem
- Next by Date: Re: The best way connecting.
- Previous by thread: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- Next by thread: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
- Indexes: