Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- From: "Tony Lausin" <tonylausin(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:32:53 -0700
[ rotfl... ] MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write
scenario. It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either,
but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one
of the other serious-money DBs.
regards, tom lane
Hi Tom, That's a scary idea - being forced into Oracle or Sybase. Isn't Slashdot.org still running strongly off of MySQL? Regards, Anthony
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- From: Matthew T. O'Connor
- Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- References:
- Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- From: Tony Lausin
- Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- From: Tom Lane
- Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- Prev by Date: Re: Operator Class for Hash
- Next by Date: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- Next by thread: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
- Indexes: