Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PostgreSQL x Sybase
- From: "Ian Harding" <iharding(at)destinydata(dot)com>
- To: "Mark Aufflick" <mark(at)aufflick(dot)com>
- Cc: Reimer <carlosreimer(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL x Sybase
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:46:26 +0000
> A commonly overlooked comparison for "always on" systems is to compare > what sorts of operations you can do to databases without needing to > restart the server or drop tables, lock out users etc. > We use Sybase Adaptive Server Anywhere 8 here and the thing that annoys me about it is exactly this. You can't modify any database objects (AFAICT) while there are other connections. I have to script things and schedule them to run in the middle of the night. There "Enterprise" product is apparently a completely different animal, so it is probably better. - Ian
- References:
- PostgreSQL x Sybase
- From: Reimer
- Re: PostgreSQL x Sybase
- From: Mark Aufflick
- PostgreSQL x Sybase
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance Killer 'IN' ?
- Next by Date: Re: How to use result column names in having cause
- Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL x Sybase
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL x Sybase
- Indexes: