Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Some pgbench results
- From: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
- To: "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
- Cc: Just Someone <just(dot)some(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Some pgbench results
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:55:35 -0500
- Message-id: <877j6ju0yg(dot)fsf(at)suzuka(dot)mcnaught(dot)org>
"Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> writes: > It might seem that I'm selling ext3 or something :) but it's the linux > filesystem I know best. > If you want ext3 to perform with large directories, there is an mkfs > option that enables directory hashing that you can try: -O dir_index. You can also turn it on for an existing filesystem using 'tune2fs' and a remount, but it won't hash already-existing large directories--those will have to be recreated to take advantage of hashing. -Doug
- References:
- Some pgbench results
- From: Just Someone
- Re: Some pgbench results
- From: Magnus Naeslund(k)
- Re: Some pgbench results
- From: Just Someone
- Re: Some pgbench results
- From: Magnus Naeslund(f)
- Some pgbench results
- Prev by Date: Re: Build only clients
- Next by Date: Re: Practical limit on number of tables ina single database
- Previous by thread: Re: Some pgbench results
- Next by thread: Re: Some pgbench results
- Indexes: