Re: information_schema._pg_keypositions() in 8.1???

From: "Jason Long" <jason(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: information_schema._pg_keypositions() in 8.1???
Date: 2005-12-01 19:10:18
Message-ID: 20051201191034.11C329DD639@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Executing the following from "information_schema.sql" from the 8.0
distribution against the restored database in 8.1 solved the problem. Is
this a bug?

*****************************************************************

SET search_path TO information_schema, public;

/*

* A few supporting functions first ...

*/

/* This returns the integers from 1 to INDEX_MAX_KEYS/FUNC_MAX_ARGS */

CREATE FUNCTION _pg_keypositions() RETURNS SETOF integer

LANGUAGE sql

IMMUTABLE

AS 'select g.s

from generate_series(1,current_setting(''max_index_keys'')::int,1)

as g(s)';

Thank you for your time,

Jason Long

CEO and Chief Software Engineer

BS Physics, MS Chemical Engineering

http://www.supernovasoftware.com

_____

From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jason Long
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:43 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] information_schema._pg_keypositions() in 8.1???

I cannot get automatic schema update to work in 8.1 with hibernate 3.0.5. I
get the following error every time.

java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: function information_schema._pg_keypositions()
does not exist

Is this something I should be looking to fix with Hibernate or PostgreSQL?

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time,

Jason Long

CEO and Chief Software Engineer

BS Physics, MS Chemical Engineering

http://www.supernovasoftware.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 19:24:23 Re: information_schema._pg_keypositions() in 8.1???
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-01 18:35:08 Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?