Re: To Postgres or not

From: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: To Postgres or not
Date: 2005-07-14 07:49:36
Message-ID: 86k6jtj08f.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:

Neil> Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as an ACID-compliant database?

Not when you can store a value that is larger than allowed, and it
is silently truncated to be within range. no *I* integrity there.

That's regardless of InnoDB or not.

MySQL is a toy compared to PostgreSQL.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory S. Williamson 2005-07-14 07:50:54 Re: Quotation marks in queries
Previous Message Martynas Brijunas 2005-07-14 07:31:33 Quotation marks in queries