• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-general 2003-02 Thread Index (6/10)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: bug - NEW and OLD in sub-selects in rules, (continued)
  • Re: bug - NEW and OLD in sub-selects in rules Brandon Craig Rhodes (Thu 13 21:40)
  • Re: bug - NEW and OLD in sub-selects in rules Tom Lane (Thu 13 22:05)
• when was a table created? Andy Kriger (Wed 12 15:36)
• Is there anything equivalent to Oracle9i's list partitioning? Jeff Bearer (Wed 12 14:38)
• Re: Is there anything equivalent to Oracle9i's list scott.marlowe (Wed 12 17:07)
• Re: Is there anything equivalent to Oracle9i's list partitioning? Christopher Browne (Wed 12 23:11)
• Re: Is there anything equivalent to Oracle9i's list partitioning? Greg Stark (Thu 13 02:23)
• Re: Is there anything equivalent to Oracle9i's list Jean-Luc Lachance (Thu 13 17:31)
• readline doubt with postgresql (on HP-UX) kanchana (Wed 12 13:24)
• Re: readline doubt with postgresql (on HP-UX) Giles Lean (Wed 12 22:36)
• Re: readline doubt with postgresql (on HP-UX) kanchana (Thu 13 13:40)
• Hi, Deepa (Wed 12 12:36)
• Re: Hi, Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> (Sat 15 06:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Hi, Deepa (Thu 13 05:24)
• Re: Hi, Nigel J. Andrews (Thu 13 13:58)
• DOMAIN constraints bug or feature Viacheslav N Tararin (Wed 12 10:08)
• view w/pgaccess bruno peracchio (Wed 12 09:52)
• Postgresql Partnership Stephane Schildknecht (Wed 12 09:36)
• COMMIT notification Viacheslav N Tararin (Wed 12 08:00)
• Re: COMMIT notification Tom Lane (Wed 12 08:27)
• Re: COMMIT notification Viacheslav N Tararin (Wed 12 08:40)
• Re: COMMIT notification Tom Lane (Wed 12 15:36)
• Possible source of error Garo Hussenjian (Wed 12 06:29)
• locale error César Eduardo Schneider (Wed 12 04:46)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• locale error César Eduardo Schneider (Wed 12 14:15)
• Re: locale error Tony Grant (Wed 12 14:33)
• Re: locale error César Eduardo Schneider (Wed 12 18:41)
• Re: locale error Oliver Elphick (Wed 12 14:37)
• Measuring Performance/Tuning Hunter Hillegas (Wed 12 00:17)
• Re: Measuring Performance/Tuning Francisco J Reyes (Wed 12 00:57)
• Report on Japan, Belgium trip Bruce Momjian (Tue 11 21:32)
• Sharing a transaction between programs. Fernando Schapachnik (Tue 11 21:01)
• Re: Sharing a transaction between programs. Steve Atkins (Fri 14 19:31)
• translating filenames into tablenames? Ed L. (Tue 11 19:08)
• Re: translating filenames into tablenames? Dmitry Tkach (Tue 11 19:58)
• Re: translating filenames into tablenames? Bruce Momjian (Thu 13 01:06)
• Re: translating filenames into tablenames? Medi Montaseri (Thu 13 01:28)
• Compile perl program with Pg John Li (Tue 11 18:17)
• mailing list archives Phil Howard (Tue 11 16:57)
• Re: mailing list archives Tom Lane (Tue 11 17:46)
• Re: mailing list archives Marc G. Fournier (Wed 12 01:35)
• Re: mailing list archives Robert Treat (Thu 13 15:56)
• Re: mailing list archives Marc G. Fournier (Thu 13 17:12)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: mailing list archives Robert Treat (Fri 14 13:29)
• Table Partitioning in Postgres: Bodanapu, Sravan (Tue 11 16:30)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Curt Sampson (Thu 13 13:25)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Bodanapu, Sravan (Mon 17 20:42)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jonathan Bartlett (Mon 17 21:41)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Curt Sampson (Tue 18 03:23)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> (Tue 18 05:33)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jean-Luc Lachance (Tue 18 18:54)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> (Wed 19 08:43)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jonathan Bartlett (Wed 19 11:44)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Greg Copeland (Wed 19 16:11)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jonathan Bartlett (Wed 19 16:31)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Greg Copeland (Wed 19 17:01)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jonathan Bartlett (Wed 19 17:31)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Peter Childs (Wed 19 17:39)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Greg Copeland (Wed 19 19:07)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Christopher Browne (Thu 20 04:17)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: scott.marlowe (Thu 20 16:15)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked] Patric Bechtel (Thu 20 17:07)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Dennis Gearon (Thu 20 18:41)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Martijn van Oosterhout (Thu 20 00:44)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jean-Luc Lachance (Wed 19 23:27)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Dann Corbit (Tue 18 19:13)
• Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: Jean-Luc Lachance (Tue 18 19:41)
• Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 16:19)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 16:44)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 17:03)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 17:14)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 19:05)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 19:17)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 19:29)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 19:36)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 21:42)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Wed 12 06:02)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Wed 12 13:29)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 19:14)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 16:53)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Greg Stark (Tue 11 17:14)
• Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 Tom Lane (Tue 11 17:21)
• Rights for view. Viacheslav N Tararin (Tue 11 14:29)
• Re: Rights for view. Rudy Young (Tue 11 15:04)
• Re: Rights for view. Oliver Elphick (Sun 16 21:18)
• Re: Rights for view. Tom Lane (Sun 16 22:11)
• Re: Rights for view. Oliver Elphick (Sun 16 23:03)
• Duplicate messages (was Re: Rights for view) Tom Lane (Sun 16 23:24)
• Re: Rights for view. Tom Lane (Tue 11 15:31)
• Re: Rights for view. Viacheslav N Tararin (Tue 11 16:22)
• Re: Rights for view. Bruno Wolff III (Tue 11 16:33)
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: Rights for view. Viacheslav N Tararin (Tue 11 16:33)
• Rights for views. Viacheslav N Tararin (Tue 11 13:46)
• Analytic Functions Cristian Custodio (Tue 11 12:45)
• Priority against catalog Cristian Custodio (Tue 11 12:26)
• Re: Priority against catalog Tom Lane (Tue 11 15:26)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Fw: Priority against catalog Cristian Custodio (Tue 11 16:36)
• Re: Fw: Priority against catalog Greg Copeland (Tue 11 16:45)
• Re: Fw: Priority against catalog Tom Lane (Tue 11 17:09)
• Fw: Priority against catalog Cristian Custodio (Tue 11 20:08)
• Can I insert Big5 Chinese from Java servlet(Tomcat) to PostgreSQL 7.3 ¾GÁn©M (Tue 11 12:04)
• Writes to transaction logs, Permission Denied Colin Mangiagalli (Tue 11 11:58)
• starting out Phil Howard (Tue 11 09:53)
• Re: starting out Tom Lane (Tue 11 15:36)
• Re: starting out Phil Howard (Tue 11 16:48)
• Re: starting out Tom Lane (Tue 11 17:43)
• URGENT: pg_dump error jerome (Tue 11 08:15)
• Re: URGENT: pg_dump error Dmitry Tkach (Tue 11 17:21)
• accessing currval(), How? ... Trigger? I think...??? Ralph Rotondo (Tue 11 08:09)
• Re: accessing currval(), How? ... Trigger? I think...??? Dmitry Tkach (Tue 11 18:21)
• Re: accessing currval(), How? ... Trigger? I think...??? Oliver Elphick (Sun 16 20:55)
• PL/PGSQL TUTORIAL Eduardo (Mon 10 23:55)
• "ON INSERT rule may not use OLD" on simple query Brandon Craig Rhodes (Mon 10 23:23)
• Re: "ON INSERT rule may not use OLD" on simple query Tom Lane (Tue 11 04:19)
• arrays and pl/pgsql? Richard Welty (Mon 10 23:08)
• Re: arrays and pl/pgsql? Richard Welty (Thu 13 18:47)
• Re: arrays and pl/pgsql? Brandon Craig Rhodes (Thu 13 19:50)
• Re: arrays and pl/pgsql? Guy Fraser (Thu 20 17:08)
• Re: data mining and warehousing John Smith (Mon 10 21:38)
• GnuPG / PGP signed MD5 checksums for PostgreSQL 7.3.2, 7.3.1, 7.3, and 7.2.3 gregbcc (Mon 10 21:34)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• GnuPG / PGP signed MD5 checksums for PostgreSQL 7.3.2, 7.3.1, 7.3, and 7.2.3 greg (Mon 10 21:45)
• Oracle9i's list partitioning equivalent feature Jeff Bearer (Mon 10 19:53)
• Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Ed L. (Mon 10 19:31)
• Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Tom Lane (Mon 10 20:50)
• Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Ed L. (Mon 10 22:06)
• Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Tom Lane (Mon 10 23:28)
• Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Ed L. (Tue 11 01:01)
• Why must SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in target list? Dave Smith (Mon 10 18:58)
• Re: Why must SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in target list? Greg Stark (Sat 15 17:28)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Why must SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in target list? Dave Smith (Mon 10 19:05)
• Re: Why must SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in target list? Tom Lane (Mon 10 19:37)
• renaming table leaves constraint behind [7.3.2] Holger Klawitter (Mon 10 18:31)
• Re: renaming table leaves constraint behind [7.3.2] Tom Lane (Mon 10 19:21)
• Re: renaming table leaves constraint behind [7.3.2] Holger Klawitter (Tue 11 08:12)
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Chantal Ackermann (Mon 10 16:51)
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Neil Conway (Mon 10 17:27)
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Chantal Ackermann (Mon 10 17:53)
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Lamar Owen (Mon 10 18:13)
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Tom Lane (Mon 10 18:32)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: upgrade from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2 Ian Harding (Mon 10 17:04)
• prostgres + java + transactions jose antonio leo (Mon 10 14:54)
• New DBTools Manager 2.0.1 Crercio O. Silva (Mon 10 12:53)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• New DBTools Manager 2.0.1 Crercio O. Silva (Mon 10 13:34)
• Not finding local variables and libs Martin Marques (Mon 10 11:27)
• Re: Not finding local variables and libs Stephan Szabo (Mon 10 16:03)
• Re: Not finding local variables and libs ahoward (Mon 10 17:30)
• Re: Not finding local variables and libs Martin Marques (Tue 11 11:38)
• Maximum size of the primary key Jass (Mon 10 10:20)
• Re: Maximum size of the primary key Tom Lane (Fri 14 21:57)
• Updating a table via a view Glen Eustace (Mon 10 08:08)
• Re: Updating a table via a view ahoward (Mon 10 08:20)
• Re: Updating a table via a view Shridhar Daithankar (Mon 10 08:40)
• Re: Updating a table via a view Tom Lane (Mon 10 14:54)
• Re: Updating a table via a view Glen Eustace (Tue 11 08:29)
• Just installed using Fink on OS X. Fails all over the place. Guyren G Howe (Mon 10 06:16)
• Re: Just installed using Fink on OS X. Fails all over Jeffrey Bohmer (Fri 14 18:55)
• Re: Just installed using Fink on OS X. Fails all over Tony Grant (Sat 15 08:19)
• configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH Nick Kelly (Sun 09 23:00)
• Match Full on foreign Key Marc Richards (Sun 09 17:57)
• Re: Match Full on foreign Key ljb (Sun 09 22:57)
• PostgreSQL x Oracle Marcelo Pereira (Sun 09 15:36)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Ben-Nes Michael (Sun 09 15:49)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Fabrizio Ermini (Mon 10 14:42)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Andrew Sullivan (Mon 10 15:57)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle snpe (Mon 10 21:32)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Lee Harr (Sun 09 22:56)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Simon Mitchell (Mon 10 02:48)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Mark Kirkwood (Mon 10 07:49)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle felix (Thu 13 18:57)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Marcelo Pereira (Mon 10 11:27)
• how to install? Mohd Ghalib Akhtar (Mon 10 11:41)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Karel Zak (Mon 10 12:41)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Shridhar Daithankar (Mon 10 12:51)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Karel Zak (Mon 10 13:04)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle ahoward (Mon 10 15:56)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Christopher Browne (Mon 10 14:11)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Andrew Sullivan (Mon 10 15:51)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Christopher Browne (Tue 11 00:39)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Nigel J. Andrews (Tue 11 01:26)
• Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle Andrew Sullivan (Tue 11 16:46)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc