• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-general 2001-06 Chronological Index (1/10)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 January 2012
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
  • [no subject] Unknown (02:49)
• 30 June 2001
  • Re: about PostgreSQL...(important) Eric G. Miller (19:07)
  • Re: OIDs Peter Eisentraut (16:21)
  • OIDs Kapil Tilwani (15:27)
  • A small question about Red Hat Kapil Tilwani (15:27)
  • Re: User defined type with text* field Tom Lane (15:03)
  • Re: User defined type with text* field Alex Pilosov (14:48)
  • User defined type with text* field Ken K (14:15)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Doug McNaught (13:30)
  • Re: timestamp to int Alex Pilosov (13:08)
  • Re: timestamp to int Tomas Berndtsson (09:45)
  • Re: Migrating from MSAccess Eric G. Miller (03:27)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps GH (01:39)
  • Re: multibyte tables Tatsuo Ishii (01:19)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps GH (01:17)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Micah Yoder (00:25)
• 29 June 2001
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps GH (23:10)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Micah Yoder (22:14)
  • multibyte tables mike (19:27)
  • Re: no comment Thomas T. Veldhouse (19:12)
  • Re: (was: ) Bruce Momjian (18:43)
  • Re: (was: ) Jan Wieck (18:41)
  • Re: GH (18:37)
  • Re: Bruce Momjian (18:32)
  • Re: no comment Jan Wieck (18:29)
  • Re: no comment Thomas T. Veldhouse (18:27)
  • Re: Linux will trillich (18:22)
  • Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages Tom Lane (18:08)
  • Re: Complicated query... is there a simpler way? will trillich (18:06)
  • Re: another stupid question: Database is being accessed by other users Jan Wieck (18:05)
  • Re: Plain text vs HTML mail Tom Lane (18:02)
  • Re: timestamp to int will trillich (17:43)
  • Re: Stored procedures? will trillich (17:33)
  • Re: Thomas T. Veldhouse (17:29)
  • Re: Jan Wieck (17:26)
  • Re: no comment will trillich (17:26)
  • Re: another stupid question: Database is being accessed by other users Janning Vygen (17:24)
  • pg_dump - Comments on Triggers. Ian Harding (17:24)
  • Re: another stupid question: Database is being accessed by other users Jan Wieck (17:08)
  • Re: Thomas T. Veldhouse (16:32)
  • Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages Peter Eisentraut (16:13)
  • another stupid question: Database is being accessed by other users Janning Vygen (16:01)
  • Re: Thomas T. Veldhouse (15:59)
  • Re: function cache?? Jan Wieck (15:47)
  • Migrating from MSAccess Mihai Gheorghiu (15:38)
  • Re: function cache?? Janning Vygen (15:33)
  • Re: pg_hba.conf problems Vivek Khera (15:32)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP,Postgres for real business apps Michael (15:24)
  • Re: function cache?? Janning Vygen (15:14)
  • R: I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess Fabrizio Mazzoni (14:57)
  • Re: function cache?? Tom Lane (14:53)
  • Re: I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess wsheldah (14:50)
  • Re: I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess Tom Lane (14:45)
  • Re: Trigger Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos (14:29)
  • RE: Trigger Jeff Eckermann (14:29)
  • function cache?? Janning Vygen (13:52)
  • I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess Fabrizio Mazzoni (13:44)
  • RE: tamsin (12:40)
  • Re: Triggers do the error checking Jan Wieck (12:25)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Bruce Momjian (12:11)
  • A quick SUSE question... fabrizio . ermini (10:10)
  • Re: Linux Andy Samuel (09:08)
  • Re: Vs: How to check connection? Igor (08:57)
  • unicode regular insensitive matching 2. Jan Poslusny (08:54)
  • Re: Linux John Clark Naldoza y Lopez (08:50)
  • Triggers do the error checking Janning Vygen (08:44)
  • Re: Trigger Feite Brekeveld (07:38)
  • [no subject] Kapil Tilwani (07:33)
  • Linux Kapil Tilwani (07:33)
  • Vs: How to check connection? Pasi Salminen (07:04)
  • Re: How to check connection? GH (06:12)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Ron Chmara (06:02)
  • How to check connection? Igor (05:53)
  • Trigger Andy Samuel (05:36)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Paul Tomblin (01:06)
• 28 June 2001
  • RE: Re: usability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps jeff.fitzmyers (23:41)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Alex Pilosov (23:13)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Adam Haberlach (22:14)
  • Re: Weird error Joseph Shraibman (21:58)
  • Re: About pg_dump Oliver Elphick (21:34)
  • Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages Oliver Elphick (21:29)
  • Re: unicode regular insensitive matching Peter Eisentraut (21:11)
  • Re: Linux Software RAID 1 Performance (was:Re: Re: Slower on Solaris) Steve Wolfe (20:52)
  • Re: Linux Software RAID 1 Performance (was:Re: Re: Slower on Solaris) Alex Pilosov (20:48)
  • Linux Software RAID 1 Performance (was:Re: Re: Slower on Solaris) Lamar Owen (20:21)
  • Re: About pg_dump Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos (19:57)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Bruce Momjian (19:44)
  • Re: About pg_dump Jason Earl (19:44)
  • Re: Re: Slower on Solaris (NOT that Red Hat thread anymore) Steve Wolfe (19:35)
  • Re: Slower on Solaris (NOT that Red Hat thread anymore) Philip Molter (19:08)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Vince Vielhaber (19:00)
  • Re: Weird error Alex Pilosov (18:53)
  • Re: Weird error Joseph Shraibman (18:50)
  • unicode regular insensitive matching Jan Poslusny (18:40)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Patrick Welche (18:23)
  • Exporting data from MSAccess to PostgreSQL Mihai Gheorghiu (18:16)
  • Re: Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Jan Wieck (18:11)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Roderick A. Anderson (18:04)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Bruce Momjian (18:02)
  • Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Vivek Khera (18:02)
  • Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Vivek Khera (17:32)
  • Re: sort memory size Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Alex Pilosov (17:16)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Pilosov (17:04)
  • sort memory size Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos (17:02)
  • Re: Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Mitch Vincent (16:47)
  • Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Alex Pilosov (16:39)
  • Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) Tom Lane (16:19)
  • Re: useability of apache, PHP, Postgres for real business apps Calvin Dodge (16:02)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Lincoln Yeoh (15:54)
  • Re: Why is NULL not indexable? Tom Lane (15:31)
  • Re: Bytea? Bruce Momjian (15:30)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Philip Molter (15:26)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (15:15)
  • Process weight (was:Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL) Lamar Owen (15:14)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (15:12)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Pilosov (15:11)
  • Re: Slower on Solaris (NOT that Red Hat thread anymore) Tom Lane (15:10)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Philip Molter (15:06)
  • Re: vacuum job taking very long time to complete Philip Molter (14:44)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Alex Pilosov (14:42)
  • Re: Bytea? Alex Pilosov (14:36)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Pilosov (14:35)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Shaun Thomas (14:28)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Gregory Wood (14:00)
  • Binary Data Storage? Namrata (13:31)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Shaun Thomas (13:28)
  • About pg_dump Aldo Vadillo Batista (12:51)
  • Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Justin Clift (12:43)
  • Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer Justin Clift (12:28)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL wsheldah (12:25)
  • Re: Problem with null timestamp fields Doug McNaught (12:20)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Jan Wieck (12:00)
  • Re: Weird error Hiroshi Inoue (10:08)
  • RE: Re: Adding a NOT NULL column? tamsin (09:23)
  • Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Andreas Tille (09:23)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Gordan Bobic (09:16)
  • Bytea? Namrata (09:14)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Gordan Bobic (09:12)
  • Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) (09:02)
  • Please oh Please stop--> RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Eric Ridge (08:59)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Gordan Bobic (08:53)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Gordan Bobic (08:47)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Gordan Bobic (08:38)
  • Elephant book is updated daily pgsql-general (06:45)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Lincoln Yeoh (05:34)
  • Re: installation error GH (04:50)
  • Fw: installation error エイエムエス (03:54)
  • installation error エイエムエス (03:52)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (03:41)
  • Re: Problem with null timestamp fields Thomas T. Veldhouse (03:29)
  • Re: Problem with null timestamp fields Jason Earl (03:16)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Philip Molter (03:11)
  • Re: Problem with null timestamp fields GH (03:03)
  • Problem with null timestamp fields Thomas T. Veldhouse (02:35)
  • Re: Why is NULL not indexable? Martijn van Oosterhout (01:17)
  • Re: Blobs in PostgreSQL Alex Pilosov (01:11)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL John Clark Naldoza y Lopez (00:49)
  • Re: Blobs in PostgreSQL Richard Church (00:48)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL John Clark Naldoza y Lopez (00:43)
• 27 June 2001
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (23:58)
  • RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Tim Mickol (23:30)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (23:26)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (23:21)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (23:20)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød (23:00)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (22:58)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (22:51)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød (22:43)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (22:38)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Alex Knight (22:34)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe (22:33)
  • Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (22:28)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]