Re: [GENERAL] Database Best Practices ???
- From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "amy cheng" <amycq(at)hotmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, ghoffman(at)ucsd(dot)edu
- Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Database Best Practices ???
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 05:54:27 +0100
- Message-id: <199908310454.FAA10103@linda.lfix.co.uk> <text/plain>
"amy cheng" wrote:
>Oliver, or/and, Gary, and all other experts,
>
>I studied this design:
>1) inheritance and trigger: since "person" and "person-address" relationship
>
>already has triggers, why "organization" and "individual" still need
>triggers with "person-address"?
I don't think that triggers can be inherited automatically. That is why I
did it that way. The implementation of inheritance still needs a lot of
work in PostgreSQL.
>2) "person-address" is the relationship between "address" and
> "person", why "person" still need to DIRECTLY relate with "address"?
> and, again (similar to question 1) why "organization" and "individual"
>still need?
The refint trigger is to make sure that the address record exists before
the person record is updated; if the relation is new there will not be
anything in person_address yet.
The duplication in organisation and individual is again because
inheritance is not fully and consistently implemented.
>Perhaps those codes are just jokes? ????????????????????
The project is not yet complete, so there may be bugs in it!
--
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
========================================
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
" ...Take heed, and beware of covetousness; for a man's
life consisteth not in the abundance of the things
which he possesseth." Luke 12:15
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index