Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> > > consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p
> >
> > That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
> > some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?
>
> TWiki does not use a database backend. About the PostgreSQL thing,
Really? How does it actually store things then, and deal with concurrency
etc?
> the remark was made by someone from twiki.net, a commercial entity that
> only recently started business, and in no way reflects what the open
> source community thinks about this.
Ah, now that you mention it, I remember that's what it was. So that
argument is moot then.
//Magnus
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index