Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

["Dave Page" <dpage ( at ) pgadmin ( dot ) org>]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus ( at ) hagander ( dot ) net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
>  > > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
>  > > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
>  > > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
>  >
>  > Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.
>
>  I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
>  worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
>  mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
>  thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
>  install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)
>

That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company