Hello all, On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:53:56AM +0100, damien clochard wrote: > > i have identified 5 issues and several possible solutions for every issue : > > 1- Membership fee ? > a : Keep the statutes as they are > b : No membership fee for people > c : Optional membership fee for people As pointed out (by me) earlier: we should avoid requiring a fee for the membership but instead we should try to help local users and groups with our money which we can get from sponsorship or merchandising. In this case we can circumvent the whole "membership fee" topic. > 2- Membership ? > a : Keep the statutes as they are > b : Automatic membership for users of local groups > c : Optional membership for users of local groups I apply for free choice but i also see the requirement for pushing local groups. So in this case b) or c) is fine for me. > 3- Quorum ? > a : Keep the statutes as they are > b : Lower the quorum > c : Drop the quorum Having a quorum is a nice thing, especially if you discuss and decide "hot" topics. In this case a quorum makes sense. For everything else we have the fallback with a second meeting without quorum. So why dropping or lowering he quorum? > 4- Takeover protection ? > a : Keep statutes as they are > b : Add more criterium for the member to satisfy As long as only people from EU can "take over", i don't care much. From germany i know, that the member base in an association can be replaced in 2 or 3 years. People join and leave or just join and never leave and new people come and do the work. > 5- Companies : sponsors or members ? > a : Keep the statutes as they are > b : Companies are sponsors Companies are not members, companies are sponsors. Companies can send individuals to be a member in the group ... as long as this individuals are from europe ;-) Kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum German PostgreSQL User Group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature