Re: order of entries in admin docs

["Ian Barwick" <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>]

2008/5/8 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> There isn't much additional text except a description of each item.
>
> That's the way it should be: Each parameter explains what it does.  There can
> be more extensive documentation about how they all fit together elsewhere.
>
> What I would like to see is getting rid of the sections the parameters are
> grouped in and put them all in alphabetical order.  I find the current
> arrangement completely unusable; nine times out of ten I cannot find the
> right section.  The topical grouping of the options would be the job of the
> more extensive documentation elsewhere I mentioned above.
>
> I think Postfix has arranged this nicely:
> http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html -- You have various sections
> explaining how to configure for various jobs, and one big list of all
> parameters explained.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
>



-- 
http://sql-info.de/index.html