Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
- Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:56:01 -0500
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:35:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> If we need a FAQ entry on this at all, I'd stop after David's first >> two sentences. > Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations > point of view. Pointing to an alternative product doesn't make that any better. What would make it better is to explain *why* we design PG this way. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- From: David Fetter
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- References:
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- From: David Fetter
- Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Prev by Date: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Next by Date: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Previous by thread: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Next by thread: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
- Indexes: