Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:58:42 -0500
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes: >>> Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't >>> we find an RFC or something? >> >> See above. > If anything, we should link to OpenSSL, because they implement the API we are > referring to. I don't know what HP has to do with it. Yeah, I was thinking a simple pointer to www.openssl.org would be more appropriate. We're not here to substitute for somebody doing their own Google search ... regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- References:
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Prev by Date: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Next by Date: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Previous by thread: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Next by thread: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Indexes: