Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:58:42 -0500
- Message-id: <10277.1201802322@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't
>>> we find an RFC or something?
>>
>> See above.
> If anything, we should link to OpenSSL, because they implement the API we are
> referring to. I don't know what HP has to do with it.
Yeah, I was thinking a simple pointer to www.openssl.org would be more
appropriate. We're not here to substitute for somebody doing their
own Google search ...
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index