Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:01:41 -0500
- Message-id: <9472.1201798901@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> PQinitSSL *is* documented, though looking at the para immediately raises >> the question what the heck we are doing pointing to a random hp.com page >> for SSL documentation. > I added that for 8.3. The HP documentation seemed excellent, which is > why I added it. The question is not about whether that doc is good, bad, or indifferent; it is about the likely lifespan of the URL. A URL containing mostly random numbers instead of words does not fill me with confidence. Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't we find an RFC or something? regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- References:
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Prev by Date: Re: Supported platforms list
- Next by Date: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Previous by thread: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Next by thread: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
- Indexes: