Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
- Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:29:48 -0500
- Message-id: <19882.1200886188@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
>> of prominence. Here's a V3 try
> That one looks good to me. These are small details but better to get it
> right now.
OK, committed. Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index