Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

["Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>]

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > ...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be 
> > mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would 
> > make the rest of this moot yes?
>
> I don't have any objection to listing people on the contributors page
> on the strength of their work on contrib modules.  But that seems
> orthogonal to the question of what should be in the SGML docs ...

All I was saying is I don't think we need the redundancy :). E.g; if 
they are worthy in the docs, they are worthy on the contributors page 
and thus not needed in the docs.

I am not of a strong opinion either way but it seems having names 
plastered everywhere just creates more management of information for no 
particular purpose.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 			regards, tom lane