Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:49:11 -0800
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:Tom Lane wrote:"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient.I think that the above claim is exceedingly narrow-minded.We are talking about partitioning. It is supposed to be narrow-minded.Sure, but look at all the confusion we have had just on this list about it. We had better state why triggers should be used in place of rules _for_ _partitioning_ or that confusion will continue.
Sure I have no problem with that. Joshua D. Drake
- References:
- Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Indexes: