Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
- To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:06:01 -0300
David Fetter wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane managed to contrive an example where RULEs might > conceivably be the least-bad way to do this, that being a machine > where no PLs may be installed. Perhaps this just means we should consider installing plpgsql by default. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC "There was no reply" (Kernel Traffic)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: David Fetter
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- References:
- Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: David Fetter
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: David Fetter
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- From: David Fetter
- Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Prev by Date: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Next by Date: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Previous by thread: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Next by thread: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
- Indexes: