Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it, 
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for 
> contrib.

I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of
the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have
*not* installed or even heard of the modules.  So "it's not in the docs
unless you installed it" seems counter to the point.

			regards, tom lane