Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

[Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>]

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Greg,
>
>   
> > Are you suggesting to add an additional piece of work to the already
> > behind schedule 8.3 timeline when there's already this idea floating
> > around to overhaul the entire contrib structure in 8.4, which may very
> > well make much of that work redundant?  Albert's work is cool and all, but
> > from from back here where I sit I'd expect anyone in a position to
> > integrate it into 8.3 properly should be working on something that's
> > already on the to-do list instead.
> >     
>
> Or the contrib overhaul may *not* get into 8.4 (ala updatable views).  Having 
> the contrib stuff in the main docs would remove one of the largest barriers 
> to people knowing about the contrib features.
>
>   

I don't agree with Greg that we shouldn't make this docs improvement. I 
do think we should do it in such a way that it will fit with our plans 
for the future.

cheers

andrew