Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
- From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:18:44 -0700
- Message-id: <1188411524.32003.6.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com> <text/plain>
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 13:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why wouldn't we just remove the README files altogether? I can't
> see maintaining duplicate sets of documentation.
I agree that duplication is bad, but I think README files in the
individual contrib directories is useful and worth keeping: if I'm about
to install a contrib module and want to learn how to install and use it,
this change would only make that information *more* difficult to find.
I wonder if it would be possible to keep the master version of the
contrib docs as SGML, and generate plaintext READMEs from it during the
documentation build.
-Neil
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index