Re: Documentation of pg_badkend_pid and stats functions

[Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>]

On May 7, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Jim Nasby wrote:
> > > On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > > > Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
> > > > functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
> > > > section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
> > > > of the functions?
> > >
> > > No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
> >
> > Yea, I was wondering about that.  I think the best idea would be to
> > reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
> > than move them.
>
> Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats  
> functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the  
> other stuff.

Turns out it didn't really make much more sense to move  
pg_backend_pid either, so I went with Bruce's original idea.

Attachment: monfunc.patch
Description: Binary data

--
Jim Nasby                                            jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)