Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries
- From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 22:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> That doesn't mean this one isn't useful. Please revert this. > > > Well, Tom and I thought it caused confusion, as did the person reporting > > the confusion. You saying to revert it isn't enough. > > A possible compromise is to describe or show the syntax in some informal > form, so that it didn't look like one of the <synopsis> sections we use > for supported syntax. I'm not sure what that would look like exactly, > but I do see merit in both sides of this discussion... I am all for us describing how we don't match the SQL spec, but just showing the syntax doesn't seem to help people understand how we don't match the spec, does it? Are there more details to column-level GRANT except saying we don't support it? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries
- Next by Date: uuid type not documented
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries
- Indexes: