Re: documention wrong or just not clear?

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> In http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/routine-vacuuming.html it says:
> "The age column measures the number of transactions from the cutoff XID to the 
> current transaction's XID. Immediately after a VACUUM, age(relfrozenxid) 
> should be a little more than the vacuum_freeze_min_age setting that was used 
> (more by the number of transactions started since the VACUUM started). "

> However my results don't seem to bear that out:

I would imagine that your database (or at least some of your tables) are
not yet vacuum_freeze_min_age transactions old.

			regards, tom lane