Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- From: Toru SHIMOGAKI <shimogaki(dot)toru(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
- To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
- Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:58:43 +0900
Jim Nasby wrote:
On Mar 2, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Toru SHIMOGAKI wrote:I think that to avoid this problem, "increasing swap area" should be added onthis manual. Increasing both physical memory and swap area is easy to understand, but increasing physical memory is not software solution.Good idea; care to submit a patch? :)
Yes, I'll submit a patch as soon as possible. -- Toru SHIMOGAKI<shimogaki(dot)toru(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
- References:
- avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- From: Toru SHIMOGAKI
- Re: avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- From: Jim Nasby
- avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- Prev by Date: Re: avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- Next by Date: doc patch for Linux memory overcommit
- Previous by thread: Re: avoiding a problem that postmaster is suddenly killed by OOM-Killer
- Next by thread: doc patch for Linux memory overcommit
- Indexes: