Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:44:45 -0800
>> > On the front page, we already have "Latest Releases" with links to the
>> > most recent release for each version still actively maintained and
>> > release notes. (Would it make sense to change that title from "Latest
>> > Releases" to "Actively Maintained Releases")
>>
>> I think not. The meaning is "latest releases available for each branch",
>> not "these are the actively maintained branches".
>
> Why aren't 7.3.18, 7.2.8, 7.1.6, etc there then?
>
> Clearly there is some criteria for which branches are presented there.
<7.3 is EOL. We still back patch what we can but they are considered
deprecated.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: Andrew Hammond
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- From: Andrew Hammond
- Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Prev by Date: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Next by Date: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Previous by thread: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Next by thread: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
- Indexes: