Re: Switching to XML

["Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>]

On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 09:21 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
> >>> OpenOfice.org.
> >> Sure, there are more editing options with DocBook XML.  No one disputes 
> >> that.  But the question at hand was about processing the DocBook.
> > 
> > Yes which is generated from our use of SGML which is the core of this
> > problem and the core of the question as a whole.
> > 
> > SGML is making working with the documentation *harder*.
> > 
> 
> +1

I believe this point is being overlooked is people's willingness to code
a solution ;).

Guillaume could you please tell us *why* you ported the SGML to XML
before doing your translation and processing? Perhaps that will carry
more weight to this discussion then my hand waving.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate