Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:45:24 -0400
Jeff Frost wrote:
> So it looks like the original was correct all along, but with Tom's regex
> it's much cleaner. Too bad grep's regex engine doesn't support {24}.
Try grep -E ... it's even POSIX AFAIR.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
- References:
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Jeff Frost
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Next by thread: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Indexes: