Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:55:16 +0100
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:24 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > And if we can't provide one, should we supply an SQL function > to return the current WAL name? I'll do this. Just give me a few days to get my feet under the new desk. I know its well past time I sorted this and a few other things out. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- References:
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Next by Date: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Next by thread: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
- Indexes: