pgsql: Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct

From: tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct
Date: 2007-08-05 15:11:40
Message-ID: 20070805151140.6EEE19FB8FF@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct to
check for __INTEL_COMPILER. Per report from Dirk Tilger.
Not back-patched since I don't fully trust it yet ...

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/include/storage:
s_lock.h (r1.162 -> r1.163)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/storage/s_lock.h.diff?r1=1.162&r2=1.163)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-05 15:43:01 pgsql: Adjust configure so that it sets CFLAGS properly for Intel's icc
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-04 21:53:00 pgsql: Fix up bad layout of some comments (probably pg_indent's fault),