Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Michael Milligan <milli(at)acmeps(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:16:24 -0300
- Message-id: <20081229151624.GH4545@alvh.no-ip.org> <text/plain>
Tom Lane wrote: > 2008-09-15 21:56 tgl > > * src/include/storage/: lock.h (REL8_1_STABLE), lock.h > (REL8_3_STABLE), lock.h (REL8_0_STABLE), lock.h (REL8_2_STABLE), > lock.h: Widen the nLocks counts in local lock tables from int to > int64. Doh, I didn't see it because I only checked the change log for lock.c, not lock.h :-( > > A customer of ours started hitting this bug too, last week. > > Tut tut, customer not on latest point release? Wouldn't be a first for them (we try hard, they don't necessarily heed advice). Thanks! -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held
- Next by Date: ALTER TABLE DISABLE RULE does not work inside of a transaction
- Previous by thread: Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held
- Next by thread: ALTER TABLE DISABLE RULE does not work inside of a transaction
- Indexes: