Re: Postgre cant start
- From: Olivier Bessière <obessiere(at)boomerangpharma(dot)com>
- To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Postgre cant start
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:00:23 +0200
- Message-id: <003401c894b9$22d871d0$68895570$(at)com>
Hello,
Actually... You're command line just fully fixed my problem. Postmaster is
starting like he never got any problem.
Thank you so much for this helpful answer.
How can I thank you ? Are you traveling to France soon ?
Regards
/Olivier
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: mardi 1 avril 2008 20:50
To: Olivier Bessière
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Postgre cant start
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Bessi=E8re?= <obessiere(at)boomerangpharma(dot)com> writes:
> PostgreSQL V7.1
Egad. You really, really, really need to update forthwith.
The list of bugs that have been fixed since 7.1 would curl your toes.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release.html
> FATAL 2: cannot read block 1802 of pg_log: Success
This suggests that pg_log has been truncated. Try something like
dd bs=8192 count=1 seek=1802 if=/dev/zero of=$PGDATA/global/1269
and try to start the postmaster. If it then complains about a higher
block number, add that one in the same way, and repeat.
I don't have a whole lot of confidence that this will get you a
self-consistent database, but maybe you will be able to extract
some data. Dump, compare against your last backup (you do have
one I trust), see what data you believe.
For heaven's sake, update!
regards, tom lane
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2992 (20080401) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2994 (20080402) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index