Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
- To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:52:33 +0000
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:43:25PM -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > Eugen(dot)Konkov(at)aldec(dot)com wrote: > >a column definition list is required for functions returning "record" > >It seems a BUG > > > I don't think so. We can say it is a missing feature. As stated in [1], > record types don't have a predefined structure -- they're placeholders. I was having a similar discussion with Gregory Stark about this and hadn't realised that such small amounts of state was recorded with each row. > How do you know the row structure before hand? Its structure can be > changed on-the-fly. Sorry, I don't understand this comment. Could you elaborate? Sam
- References:
- Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- From: Eugen.Konkov
- Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
- Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Prev by Date: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Next by Date: Re: BUG: wrong doc or wrong connectby?
- Previous by thread: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Next by thread: Documentation commenting does not work
- Indexes: