Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
- To: Eugen(dot)Konkov(at)aldec(dot)com
- Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:43:25 -0300
Eugen(dot)Konkov(at)aldec(dot)com wrote:
I don't think so. We can say it is a missing feature. As stated in [1], record types don't have a predefined structure -- they're placeholders. How do you know the row structure before hand? Its structure can be changed on-the-fly.a column definition list is required for functions returning "record" It seems a BUG
Are you agree with my suggestion? If so will you plan to fix this BUG?
TODO?[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-declarations.html#PLPGSQL-DECLARATION-RECORDS
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: FOR-IN-EXECUTE: FOR does not replanned on each entry to the FOR loop
- Next by Date: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Previous by thread: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Next by thread: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record
- Indexes: