Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Kevin Hunt <kevin(at)centropy(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:11:23 +0000
- Message-id: <1200427883(dot)4266(dot)1777(dot)camel(at)ebony(dot)site>
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Hunt" <kevin(at)centropy(dot)com> writes: > > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the > > path, but also filename. > > Hm? "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about. Agreed. > > An example showing how the sample commands would be expanded would also > > help: > > That sounds reasonable. Yep, I'll scan the docs and submit a patch, unless Tom has already. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- Next by thread: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
- Indexes: