Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp views as well? appears it did not.
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "chris wood" <chrisj(dot)wood(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
- Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp views as well? appears it did not.
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:11:27 -0500
"chris wood" <chrisj(dot)wood(at)sympatico(dot)ca> writes: > Plpgsql procedure: Would you provide a self-contained test case, rather than a handwavy description? It certainly should work, so I suppose there is some critical point that you left out. Also, you *are* testing 8.3something, right? What exactly? regards, tom lane
- References:
- Prev by Date: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp views as well? appears it did not.
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #3787: configure: error: readline library not found
- Previous by thread: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp views as well? appears it did not.
- Next by thread: BUG #3788: POSIX regexp seems doesn't work for '(?!re) ' pattern
- Indexes: