Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

I wrote:
> Also, we have a generic issue that making fresh entries in a hashtable
> might result in a concurrent hash_seq_search scan visiting existing
> entries more than once; that's definitely not something any of the
> existing callers are thinking about.

> I'm too tired to think about fixes right now, but we've definitely
> found a hotbed of actual and potential bugs.

I've committed a fix for this; it'll be in the next set of releases.

			regards, tom lane