Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:21:23 -0500 (EST)
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > > comments. > > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use > this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar > interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question". I don't use Solaris so I don't know if it is frequent issue or not. I assume the author knows. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
- References:
- Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #3079: pg_dump doesn't dump datascheme with uppercase letters in
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Indexes: