Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:56:29 +0100
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > comments. The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question". -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Zdenek Kotala
- Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- References:
- BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Rich Teer
- Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- From: Zdenek Kotala
- BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
- Indexes: